8B. ANALYSIS PART 2

CHAPTER 8B 'ANALYSIS' 83 FROM RESULTS OF ELASTIC ANALYSIS BY THE METHOD OF CATHOLIC CONDENSITY INDEX (q) BY THE METHOD OF LOCAL FLATNESS INDEX (m) It automatically opens a file that, for the "active analysis", contains the results of the checks: Checking the Difference of Masses and Rigidity of Building Stations (par.4.2.3.3.3.) 5.1.2. Check average relative movement between floor nodes (par.5.5.2a(iii)) Check average relative movement by X between floors (par.5.5.2a(iv)) Check average relative movement by Z between floors (par.5.5.2a(iv)) And at the end the: Critical indicators of structural failure l (paragraph 5.5.2(a)(i)) This table summarises the elements that fail and need to be strengthened. The above check of the indicators of inadequacy is done in terms of intensive quantities (bending moments). The program calculates the bending indices λ for all structural elements (flat and flattened). At the same time, however, the categorisation of the elements into flat and loose elements is done. Based on the CEE, 3 criteria of fishiness are applied and if even one of the 3 is valid, the element is defined as fishy and the corresponding inadequacy index λ is calculated based on the shear forces. This calculation is done regardless of whether the method of analysis is (m) or (q). A detailed presentation of the failing elements and the analytical results of the sandy elements and the flat elements are presented in the prints section below.