Table of Contents 1 134

EXAMPLE 6. BUILDING VALUATION & REDESIGN STUDY

FOREWORD 3
VALUATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES (§2.1 OF THE CODE OF PRACTICE) 4
REDESIGN (§2.4 OF THE ANNUITY SCHEME) 4
VALUATION AND REDESIGN OBJECTIVES (§2.2 OF THE REGULATION) 4
Performance levels §2.2.1 5
Correlation between return period and probability of exceeding the seismic action §2.2.1 (3h revision of the 2022 EIS) 5
Assessment and redesign objectives §2.2 6
Investigation, documentation of the load-bearing structure of an existing structure §3 8
Security check 12
Sd= γSd⋅ S (Sk⋅ γf) and 12
Individual safety factors §4.5 13
For the Simulators § 4.5.1 13
Analysis 13
4.6 SINGLE INTEREST INDICATOR q 14
4.7 LOCAL INDICATORS m 15
4.4.1.3 Response spectra 15
The shape of the operation 16
The SCADA Pro 17
REQUIREMENTS 17
INTRODUCTION 17
GENERAL DESCRIPTION 18
A. Geometry 18
B. Materials 18
C. Regulations 18
D. Loading - analysis assumptions 18
- Dynamic Spectral Method with homonymous torsional pairs. 18
1oSTEP 1: PRELIMINARY PROCEDURE 20
1.1. Create a New Project 20
1.2. Modelling 21
1.3. Plates-Boards 21
1.4. Analysis 21
E. Criteria for exemption from the structural adequacy inspection of existing buildings, according to Government Gazette 350/17-2-2016 22
"The structural design of the existing building has been carried out with "full provision for the addition", i.e. all floors of the addition have been included in the structural simulation of the existing building" 22
1.5. Sizing 26
OBSERVATIONS: 29
& SKYRODEMA 30
& HALYVAS: 31
3h revision of the EIA CIP 33
F. New data on the structural adequacy of arbitrary buildings, in the context of the implementation of the urban planning law 4495/2017 35
γf=1,0 35
1.6. Modification and adaptation of the reinforcement 36
OBSERVATION: 37
OBSERVATION: 37
1.7. Storage and import of modified armaments 38
PROCEDURE: 38
1.8. Interaction Diagrams 39
1.8.2 Recalculation of the figures of CAN.Ltd. 41
2oSTEP 2: PREVENTION 42
2. Foreword 42
2.1 Introduction 42
OBSERVATION: 42
EPC 5.5.1.1.1 Structural element failure index 43
CAN.EPE 5.5.1.1.2 Morphological regularity 43
§Control of the influence of the higher idioms) 43
EPE 5.5.2 Conditions of application (Elastic static analysis) 43
2.2 Pre-check 46
OBSERVATION: 48
3h revision of the EIA: 48
Table S 4.2: Values of the cSd coefficient 49
3h revision of the 2022 EIA. 50
OBSERVATIONS: 53
2.3 Influence of the upper peculiarities 55
3(a) STEP 3: ANALYTICAL ANALYSIS 59
3(a).1 General 59
3(a).2 Creating an Elastic Analysis Scenario 60
OBSERVATION: 62
EPE 5.7.3.3.3 Distribution of seismic loads by height 62
CAN.EPE 5.7.3.2 Definition of the control node 63
EXAMPLE: 64
CAN.EPE *7.2.3. Active stiffness of OS data 65
G. Earthquake victims - Official Gazette, No. No. 455, 25/02/20 68
CHARACTERISATION OF EARTHQUAKE VICTIMS 68
OBSERVATION: 69
H. Spectrum acceleration for on design repair design earthquake victims - 70
"Significant Damage" (B), 72
i. For buildings of category KI: 72
ii. For buildings of category KII: 74
3(a).3.3 Automatic Procedure 76
3(a).4 PUSHOVER Analysis Combinations 78
3(a).5 PUSHOVER Analysis Results 80
3(a).5.1 Capability Curve 83
EPE 7.1.2.2.1 Intensity-Deformation "F-d" curve 83
3(a).5.2 Bilinear Capability Curve 84
CAN.EPE 5.7.3.4 Idealised force-mobility curve 84
3(α). 5.3 Targeted Movement 89
EIA 5.7.4.2 Targeted movement 89
CAN.EPE 2.2.1 General 89
3(a).6 Illustration of the operator 92
I. Member torque - turn diagram 94
OBSERVATION: 95
3(a).7 Creation of diagrams for study booklet-Checks 101
3(a).8 PUSHOVER Analysis Checks 101
OBSERVATION: 102
• Control at operator level 102
OBSERVATION: 104
wall. 104
OBSERVATION: 105
OBSERVATION: 105
OBSERVATION: 106
3(α).9 Results - Active stiffnesses 107
3(a).10 Seismic Action 108
J. Showing Proficiency Ratios with Color Grading 109
4(a) STEP 4: ENCOUNTERS 111
4 (a).1 General 111
4 (a).2 Aid 112
PENS and WALLS : DOKOI : 112
3(b) STEP 3: ELASTIC ANALYSIS 114
3(b).1 General 114
3h revision of the EIA: 116
• Select: 116
• Extent of Damage 116
IMPORTANT OBSERVATION: 117
• Method of Calculation - Analysis / Performance 117
3h revision of the 2022 EIA. 118
K. Explanatory Example: 121
L. Show adequacy reasons with Color Grading 126
4(b) STEP 4: ENCOUNTERS 128
EXAMPLE 130
6. Printed from 132

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTIwNzc=