EXAMPLE 6. BUILDING VALUATION & REDESIGN STUDY

EXAMPLE 6: "STUDY FOR THE VALUATION AND REDESIGN OF A BUILDING ACCORDING TO THE CANC. 130 The new method of valuation and redesign that can be followed as an alternative to the one analysed above and applicable until now. This method applies only to buildings of importance I and II and only for the basic seismic class B. So for buildings of importance I and II it follows: 1. wastheuntil now with table PA2.1, that is, whatever class your building belongs to, you must meet the minimum requirements of the table. 2. The new possibility provided by the PA2.2 table where, after determining the basic seismic class to which your building belongs, it is enough to go up one basic seismic class. seismic class, but this class shall be higher or at least equal to the minimum of table PA2.2. The above will be understood with an example EXAMPLE Building after 1995 Significance II 1. I do not specify its seismic class (I am not interested) and I am pursuing the minimum evaluation or redesign target C1 (as it was until now) 2. I identify the existing basic seismic class which is, for example, B2. I need to move up at least one class, i.e. to B2+ and I need to this must be higher than the minimum of table PA2.2, which for our example is B2+ but improved by one class, i.e. B1. So the target is B1. 5. NEW METHOD OF EVALUATION AND REDISTRIBUTION (CAN.EPE. 3. Review 2022)